Where are the catcalls? Oh noes!
I often browse the blog of economist and author Aaron Clarey who goes by the name, Captain Capitalism for his blog. His post, Conservative Idiots Who “Protest the Vote” about this upcoming election misses an important lesson from history where voting 3rd party changed the results of an election.
History – for those of us who actually read it instead of watching Netflix – can teach us all sorts of fun things that internet comment brawls can’t.
Voting 3rd party can push a main party in a specific direction. Don’t believe me?
Take for example the presidential election of 1924. Calvin Coolidge crushed his main democratic opponent, but his election win helped reveal a noticeable split had occurred in the democratic party.
The democrat nominee for president was John Davis. During the election, he was considered by the growing progressive movement of the time to be too conservative. Just think about that. One only wonders what being considered too conservative by the Democrat party meant back then. Note the populist influence on progressives of the early 20th century.
The progressives that usually supported the democrat party – even though it didn’t exactly completely and utterly yet emanate their views – bolted from the party in protest and voted in favor of the 3rd party progressive candidate Robert M. La Follette from Wisconsin. This represented a deep fragmentation in the party that had finally manifested on a national level of impact.
The Election of 1924
It was a landslide election, particularly in the electoral votes for Coolidge. However, the popular vote totals are very important.
1. Calvin Coolidge receives 15,723,789 of the popular vote thus 54% of it.
2. John W. Davis receives 8,386,242 of the popular vote thus 28.8% of it.
3. Robert M. La Follette receives 4,831,706 of the popular vote thus 16.6% of it.
The end result of the 1924 election for the democrat party is that the party embraced the ideal of the progressives on their party plank and the party was forever changed. The party had secured the future votes of Progressives, but the conservative element of the party would move into a decline that is evident of the party today.
As a pessimistic libertarian, imagine if the Libertarian party cost the republicans 16% of the popular vote in a presidential election.
Yes, the “evil” Democrats would have even more of a free reign to destroy our lives than they usually do, but the Republican Party would have to change its positions if it wanted to again be a party capable of winning major elections.
We Need A System Implosion
Honestly, the Republican party is in trouble. It has been for some time just due to simple demographics. It needs to change, and it needs to change now if it wants to slow the decline. Perhaps a widespread deviation from the party by libertarian voters who are usually forced to pick between the best of two evils is taser to the nipples that the party needs.
Even if it doesn’t work in this hypothetical future situation- even though history has shown its worked in the past – the decline of the country will happen even faster. I’ve always been leaning toward the conclusion that the country is doomed. As Stephan Molyneux has one said, “The experiment in limited government has been a failure.”
I am now to the point where I strongly believe the system can’t be saved. It needs to implode and restart. We need to let the car wreck of today happen instead of pushing it off with “The Republican Party” of the trainwreck of 50 years from now. Either it’s gonna hurt now, or alot more in the future. The recent riots we’ve seen in Ferguson and now Baltimore are only the beginning.
Reading through Aaron Clarey’s (Captain Capitalism) book on the incoming decline of the country has re-affirmed and reinforced my conclusion. It is because of his views on the country’s future as a whole that I find it confusing as to why he wants to delay socialism or simply setback the incoming trainwreck through voting. I’d much rather have it happen now. (Granted I’m newly only 26, single, and have no kids.)
Now you can still be pessimistic, but you still get everything back from our robbing thieving government and enjoy life and the decline as it happens. If they are going to rob you, its time to use the welfare system to rob them back. I highly suggest Aaron Clareys: Enjoy the Decline: Accepting and Living with the Death of the United States.
Note the very conservative viewpoint of the book, but economics and our massive bureaucracy doesn’t lie. You can’t sustain a system in which there are more people who don’t work vs those that do.
Cheers to all my fellow vagrants.
One way to shut someone up is to either scare them with the threat of a lawsuit or just actually sue them. It appears Chris Kluwe understands this, but this time he isn’t picking on his former NFL team, but rather on a mansophere entrepreneur and lawyer, Mike Cernovich, from Danger & Play with the “defamation” card this time.
While usually these tactics are employed by angry businesses and corporations on yelp against anonymous users for negative reviews, you can apparently go after people for their tweets on twitter as well. This is probably just one more reason why you might want to consider anonymity on most social networks.
For the common man and the poor this usually spells doom – all kinds of impending doom. Even if you win or successfully defend yourself in court, your finances are going to be in trouble. It’s like going through a divorce where you lose all of your “stuff” no matter if your wife takes the house or not, because she’s also taking your beer fridge.
Take note of this tactic however. Mike Cernovich has a legal background which means he won’t need to hire lawyers to defend him, but his valuable time will still be wasted. The rest of us however can’t afford lawyers. Be VERY careful as to exactly what you say about certain people. Check all your bases and make sure you can’t be accused of libel, slander, and defamation.
Anything can be subjectively interpreted as harassment a.k.a. “defamation” so bullies like Chris Kluwe need to be called out for actions like this. Hold him accountable for this kind of financial oppression and censorship as it could happen to any of us who don’t have Kluwe’s millions to fight a legal battle. Stay strong Mike.
The three greatest inventions ever know to man are pretty damn obvious. They include the electric shaver, the urinal, and the internet. Okay, semantics aside dogs aren’t actually men’s best friend; the electric shaver is. Two things to consider:
1. You DONT have to be clean-shaven. You can even grow a massive beard. Even if your job bans facial hair or has strict guidelines about it, there are always ways around. Example: Go to your local mosque, tell the Imam you want to convert to Islam, and bring the proof of your conversion to your work. They won’t hassle/ try to fire you later as no one wants to get sued for workplace discrimination against Muslims. Then just go about your business like you did before.
2. Stubble and heavy stubble is your friend. There are plenty of studies out there to show that women often prefer at least a good/heavy degree of stubble. Even man-hating site Jezebel agrees with me! Do it.
Now guys who dove headfirst into their dawning of facial hair- that started at 16 for me – were first enjoyed and enthralled. I remember seeing the hairs growing and feeling almost like I had won the lotto, asserted my dominance, and gotten the girl.
Only two years later, I was getting fed up with razors and the constant irritation covering my face where ever I had shaved. Yes, I used aftershave which is a must if you want to reduce irritation afterwards. I only had slight acne a few years back, but it’s enough to dampen your confidence when you realize that girls prefer a face that doesn’t look it’s been rolled around in Poison Ivy.
It was then that invested in my first electric shaver. I noticed immediate results. My face wasn’t getting cut. The irritation was much less, if not non-existent. The shave was much faster and easier. Of course, I always used aftershave afterwards – never neglect that finish.
As time as gone by, I’ve realized that it is still difficult to get that semi-heavy stubble look I’ve been desiring as of late. I had a full beard that made me look like I was from Iran, (I have ancestors who live in an adjacent country to Iran.) but I decided it was time to try out that stubble look which I could only seem to manage well very rarely with my shaver. I went out and got another shaver that had guards with three different lengths.
Shaving my full beard down to that semi-heavy stubble was actually made very easy with the guards. I got an easy all around and consistent stubble that was actually very fast. Results?
If you are trying to get any kind of stubble look which you can easily maintain every two-three days, I highly suggest getting a cheap electric shaver from Walmart which is good for the getting the real close stuff – your cheek for instance – and a reasonably priced shaver which comes with at least three guard sizes for facial trimming and “sculpting.”
Your facial time is now. Carpe Diem.